E-mail alert  |  Contact  
Search:       Go  
Background  |   Sponsoring institutions  |   Editorial board   |   Advisory board   |   Associate editors
Call for papers  |   Submission guidelines  |   Editorial process
Current issue  |   Past issues  |  
December 2011 issue
List of authors
 
Gale, Repullo, Smets
Perotti, Suarez
Pariès, Sørensen, Rodriguez-Palenzuela
Perotti, Ratnovski, Vlahu
Herring
Drehmann, Borio, Tsatsaronis
Edge, Meisenzahl
IJCB Home   Read the journal   Past issue
Past issues
2017
 
December
September
June
March
February
2016
 
December
September
June
March
2015
 
December
September
June
March
January
2014
 
December
September
June
March
2013
 
December
September
June
March
January
2012
 
December
September
June
March
January
2011
 
December
September
June
March
2010
 
December
September
June
March
2009
 
December
September
June
March
2008
 
December
September
June
March
2007
 
December
September
June
March
2006
 
December
September
June
March
2005
 
December
September
May

A Pigovian Approach to Liquidity Regulation

by Enrico Perottia and Javier Suarezb

Abstract

This paper discusses liquidity regulation when short-term funding enables credit growth but generates negative systemic risk externalities. It focuses on the relative merit of price versus quantity rules, showing how they target different incentives for risk creation. When banks differ in credit opportunities, a Pigovian tax on short-term funding is efficient in containing risk and preserving credit quality, while quantity-based funding ratios are distortionary. Liquidity buffers are either fully ineffective or similar to a Pigovian tax with deadweight costs. Critically, they may be least binding when excess credit incentives are strongest. When banks differ instead mostly in gambling incentives (due to low charter value or overconfidence), excess credit and liquidity risk are best controlled with net funding ratios. Taxes on short-term funding emerge again as efficient when capital or liquidity ratios keep risk-shifting incentives under control. In general, an optimal policy should involve both types of tools.

JEL Codes: G21, G28.

 
Full article (PDF, 39 pages 382 kb)

Discussion by Ernst-Ludwig von Thadden


a University of Amsterdam, De Nederlandsche Bank, and Duisenberg School of Finance
b CEMFI and CEPR