E-mail alert  |  Contact  
Search:       Go  
Background  |   Sponsoring institutions  |   Editorial board   |   Advisory board   |   Associate editors
Call for papers  |   Submission guidelines  |   Editorial process
Current issue  |   Past issues  |  
June 2009 issue
List of authors
 
Pagratis, Stringa
Ehrmann, Fratzscher
Goodhart
Ferrero, Nobili
Sveen, Weinke
Musso, Stracca, van Dijk
IJCB Home   Read the journal   Past issue
Past issues
2017
 
December
September
June
March
February
2016
 
December
September
June
March
2015
 
December
September
June
March
January
2014
 
December
September
June
March
2013
 
December
September
June
March
January
2012
 
December
September
June
March
January
2011
 
December
September
June
March
2010
 
December
September
June
March
2009
 
December
September
June
March
2008
 
December
September
June
March
2007
 
December
September
June
March
2006
 
December
September
June
March
2005
 
December
September
May

The Interest Rate Conditioning Assumption

by Charles Goodhart
Financial Markets Group, London School of Economics

Abstract

A central bank’s forecast must contain some assumption about the future path for its own policy-determined short-term interest rate. I discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the three main alternatives:

  1. constant from the latest level
  2. as implicitly predicted from the yield curve
  3. chosen by the monetary policy committee (MPC)

Most countries initially chose alternative (i). With many central banks having planned to raise interest rates at a measured pace in the years 2004–06, there was a shift to (ii). However, Norway, and now Sweden, has followed New Zealand in adopting (iii), and the United Kingdom has also considered this move. So this is a lively issue.

JEL Codes: G21, G28.

 
Full article (PDF, 24 pages 294 kb)