E-mail alert  |  Contact  
Search:       Go  
Background  |   Sponsoring institutions  |   Editorial board   |   Advisory board   |   Associate editors
Call for papers  |   Submission guidelines  |   Editorial process
Current issue  |   Past issues  |  
February 2017 issue
List of authors
 
Aramonte, Rosen, Schindler
Eijffinger, Mahieu, Raes
Bluedorn, Bowdler, Koch
Takahashi
Pekarski
Ehrmann, Pfaifar, Santoro
Karaca, Tugan
Boeckx, Dossche, Peersman
IJCB Home   Read the journal   Past issue
Past issues
2017
 
March
February
2016
 
December
September
June
March
2015
 
December
September
June
March
January
2014
 
December
September
June
March
2013
 
December
September
June
March
January
2012
 
December
September
June
March
January
2011
 
December
September
June
March
2010
 
December
September
June
March
2009
 
December
September
June
March
2008
 
December
September
June
March
2007
 
December
September
June
March
2006
 
December
September
June
March
2005
 
December
September
May

Heterogeneous Bank Lending Responses to Monetary Policy: New Evidence from a Real-Time Identification

by John C. Bluedorna, Christopher Bowdlerb and Christoffer Kochc

Abstract

We present new evidence on how heterogeneity in banks interacts with monetary policy changes to impact bank lending, at both the bank and U.S. state levels. We use a new policy measure identified from narratives on FOMC intentions and real-time economic forecasts. This policy measure eliminates some of the movements in the actual federal funds rate that are endogenous to expected economic conditions. We find much stronger dynamic effects, and greater heterogeneity, in U.S. bank lending responses to the new monetary policy measure compared with the standard measure based on realized federal funds rate changes. Our findings suggest that studies using realized monetary policy changes confound monetary policy’s effects with those of changes in expected macro fundamentals. In fact, estimates from identified monetary policy changes lead to a reversal of U.S. states’ ranking by credit’s sensitivity to policy.We also extend Romer and Romer (2004)’s identification scheme, and expand the time and balance sheet coverage of the U.S. banking sample.

JEL Codes: E44, E50, G21.

 
Full article (PDF, 55 pages, 923 kb)


a International Monetary Fund
b University of Oxford
c Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas