E-mail alert  |  Contact  
Search:       Go  
Background  |   Sponsoring institutions  |   Editorial board   |   Advisory board   |   Associate editors
Call for papers  |   Submission guidelines  |   Editorial process
Current issue  |   Past issues  |  
December 2015 issue
List of authors
 
Kenny, Kostka, Masera
Apel, Claussen, Lennartsdotter, Rřisland
Szczerbowicz
König
van der Cruijsen, Jensen, de Haan
Argov, Binyamini, Borenstein, Rozenshtrom
He, Wang, Yu
Kolasa, Rubasz
IJCB Home   Read the journal   Past issue
Past issues
2017
 
December
September
June
March
February
2016
 
December
September
June
March
2015
 
December
September
June
March
January
2014
 
December
September
June
March
2013
 
December
September
June
March
January
2012
 
December
September
June
March
January
2011
 
December
September
June
March
2010
 
December
September
June
March
2009
 
December
September
June
March
2008
 
December
September
June
March
2007
 
December
September
June
March
2006
 
December
September
June
March
2005
 
December
September
May

How Frequently Should We Reestimate DSGE Models?

by Marcin Kolasa and Michal Rubaszek
Narodowy Bank Polski and Warsaw School of Economics

Abstract

A common practice in policymaking institutions using DSGE models for forecasting is to reestimate them only occasionally rather than every forecasting round. In this paper we ask how such a practice affects the accuracy of DSGE modelbased forecasts. To this end we use a canonical medium-sized New Keynesian model and compare how its quarterly real-time forecasts for the U.S. economy vary with the interval between consecutive reestimations. We find that updating the model parameters only once a year usually does not lead to any significant deterioration in the accuracy of point forecasts. On the other hand, there are some gains from increasing the frequency of reestimation if one is interested in the quality of density forecasts.

JEL Codes: C53, E37.

 
Full article (PDF, 27 pages, 298 kb)