E-mail alert  |  Contact  
Search:       Go  
Background  |   Sponsoring institutions  |   Editorial board   |   Advisory board   |   Associate editors
Call for papers  |   Submission guidelines  |   Editorial process
Current issue  |   Past issues  |  
September 2015 issue
List of authors
 
Svensson
Garnier, Mertens, Nelson
Cacciatore, Ghironi, Turnovsky
Ehrmann
Gillitzer, Simon
Walsh
Davig, Gürkaynak
Kamber, Karagedikli, Smith
IJCB Home   Read the journal   Past issue
Past issues
2017
 
December
September
June
March
February
2016
 
December
September
June
March
2015
 
December
September
June
March
January
2014
 
December
September
June
March
2013
 
December
September
June
March
January
2012
 
December
September
June
March
January
2011
 
December
September
June
March
2010
 
December
September
June
March
2009
 
December
September
June
March
2008
 
December
September
June
March
2007
 
December
September
June
March
2006
 
December
September
June
March
2005
 
December
September
May

Inflation Targeting: A Victim of Its Own Success

by Christian Gillitzer and John Simon
Reserve Bank of Australia

Abstract

Since the introduction of inflation targeting, inflation expectations have become firmly anchored at target and there has been a flattening of the Phillips curve. These changes mean that a “divine coincidence” between headline inflation and output-gap stabilization is less apparent than when inflation targeting was introduced. This has led some to call for a fundamental reengineering of inflation-targeting regimes: either adopting explicit dual mandates or replacing headline inflation with a target inflation measure more closely related to domestic output gaps. We argue instead for an evolution in the practice of CPI inflation targeting. In practice, many central banks have already moved in this direction with the adoption of flexible inflation-targeting frameworks.

JEL Codes: E31, E52, E58.

 
Full article (PDF, 29 pages, 1070 kb)

Discussion by Alexander L. Wolman