E-mail alert  |  Contact  
Search:       Go  
Background  |   Sponsoring institutions  |   Editorial board   |   Advisory board   |   Associate editors
Call for papers  |   Submission guidelines  |   Editorial process
Current issue  |   Past issues  |  
March 2008 issue
List of authors
 
Tarashev
Demertzis, Viegi
Bolt, Humphrey, Uittenbogaard
Krainer, Lopez
Zhu
Riboni, Ruge-Murcia
IJCB Home   Read the journal   Past issues
Past issues
2017
 
December
September
June
March
February
2016
 
December
September
June
March
2015
 
December
September
June
March
January
2014
 
December
September
June
March
2013
 
December
September
June
March
January
2012
 
December
September
June
March
January
2011
 
December
September
June
March
2010
 
December
September
June
March
2009
 
December
September
June
March
2008
 
December
September
June
March
2007
 
December
September
June
March
2006
 
December
September
June
March
2005
 
December
September
May

Capital Regulation and Banks' Financial Decisions

by Haibin Zhu
Monetary and Economic Department, Bank for International Settlements

Abstract

This paper develops a stochastic dynamic model to examine the impact of capital regulation on banks’ financial decisions. In equilibrium, lending decisions, capital buffer, and the probability of bank failure are endogenously determined. Compared to a flat-rate capital rule, a risk-sensitive capital standard causes the capital requirement to be much higher for small (and riskier) banks and much lower for large (and less risky) banks. Nevertheless, changes in actual capital holdings are less pronounced due to the offsetting effect of capital buffers. Moreover, the nonbinding capital constraint in equilibrium implies that banks adopt an active portfolio strategy, and hence the countercyclical movement of risk-based capital requirements does not necessarily lead to a reinforcement of the credit cycle. In fact, the results from the calibrated model show that the impact on cyclical lending behavior differs substantially across banks. Lastly, the analysis suggests that the adoption of a more risk-sensitive capital regime can be welfare improving from a regulator’s perspective, in that it causes less distortion in loan decisions and achieves a better balance between safety and efficiency.

JEL Codes: G21, G28.

 
Full article (PDF, 47 pages 547 kb)