Volume 12, Issue 2 June 2016

Supranational supervision: how much and for whom?

Abstract

We argue that the extent to which supervision of banks takes place on the supranational level should be guided by two factors: cross-border externalities from bank failure and heterogeneity in bank failure costs. Based on a simple model, we show that supranational supervision is more likely to be welfare enhancing when externalities are high and country heterogeneity is low. This suggests that different sets of countries (or regions) should differ in the extent to which their regulators cooperate across borders.We apply the insights of our model to discuss optimal supervisory arrangements for different regions of the world and contrast them with existing arrangements and current policy initiatives. We also offer a political economy discussion on the likelihood with which countries delegate supervisory authority to supranational authorities.

Authors

  • Thorsten Beck
  • Wolf Wagner

JEL codes

  • G21
  • G28

Other papers in this issue

Olympia Bover and Martin Schürz and Jiri Slacalek and Federica Teppa

Julia Le Blanc and Alessandro Porpiglia and Federica Teppa and Junyi Zhu and Michael Ziegelmeyer

Olympia Bover and Jose Maria Casado and Sonia Costa and Philip Du Caju and Yvonne McCarthy and Eva Sierminska and Panagiota Tzamourani and Ernesto Villanueva and Tibor Zavadil

Luc Arrondel and Laura Bartiloro and Pirmin Fessler and Peter Lindner and Thomas Y. Mathä and Cristiana Rampazzi and Frédérique Savignac and Tobias Schmidt and Martin Schürz and Philip Vermeulen

Marco Casiraghi and Eugenio Gaiotti and Lisa Rodano and Alessandro Secchi

Joshua Aizenman and Mahir Binici and Michael M. Hutchison

Daniela Bragoli and Massimiliano Rigon and Francesco Zanetti